<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>On the Human &#187; Participants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onthehuman.org/category/participants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onthehuman.org</link>
	<description>a project of the National Humanities Center</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Final Thoughts of a Disenchanted Naturalist</title>
		<link>http://onthehuman.org/2012/01/final-thoughts-of-a-disenchanted-naturalist/</link>
		<comments>http://onthehuman.org/2012/01/final-thoughts-of-a-disenchanted-naturalist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthehuman.org/?p=3126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In Geoffrey Harpham’s first contribution to “On the Human” he wrote,</p> <p>One of the most striking features of contemporary intellectual life is the fact that questions formerly reserved for the humanities are today being approached by scientists in various disciplines such as cognitive science, cognitive neuroscience, robotics, artificial life, behavioral genetics and evolutionary biology.</p> <p>“Approached” <p>Continue reading <a href="http://onthehuman.org/2012/01/final-thoughts-of-a-disenchanted-naturalist/">Final Thoughts of a Disenchanted Naturalist</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onthehuman.org/2012/01/final-thoughts-of-a-disenchanted-naturalist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Suicidal Tendency in the Humanities</title>
		<link>http://onthehuman.org/2012/01/a-suicidal-tendency-in-the-humanities/</link>
		<comments>http://onthehuman.org/2012/01/a-suicidal-tendency-in-the-humanities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthehuman.org/?p=3088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There is an interesting question as to why those in the humanities – most notably literary studies – have felt so dissatisfied with their performance as not just to re-invent themselves – which is fine and healthy – but to attempt to destroy their very rationale. I want to examine a tendency amongst some of <p>Continue reading <a href="http://onthehuman.org/2012/01/a-suicidal-tendency-in-the-humanities/">A Suicidal Tendency in the Humanities</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onthehuman.org/2012/01/a-suicidal-tendency-in-the-humanities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Moral Machines</title>
		<link>http://onthehuman.org/2011/12/the-future-of-moral-machines/</link>
		<comments>http://onthehuman.org/2011/12/the-future-of-moral-machines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 17:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singularity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthehuman.org/?p=3057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The prospect of machines capable of following moral principles, let alone understanding them, seems as remote today as the word "robot" is old. Some technologists enthusiastically extrapolate from the observation that computing power doubles every 18 months to predict an imminent "technological singularity" in which a threshold for machines of superhuman intelligence will be suddenly surpassed. Many Singularitarians assume a lot, not the least of which is that intelligence is fundamentally a computational process. The techno-optimists among them also believe that such machines will be essentially friendly to human beings. I am skeptical about the Singularity, and even if "artificial intelligence" is not an oxymoron, "friendly A.I." will require considerable scientific progress on a number of fronts. <p>Continue reading <a href="http://onthehuman.org/2011/12/the-future-of-moral-machines/">The Future of Moral Machines</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onthehuman.org/2011/12/the-future-of-moral-machines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whole-Body Apoptosis and the Meanings of Lives</title>
		<link>http://onthehuman.org/2011/12/whole-body-apoptosis/</link>
		<comments>http://onthehuman.org/2011/12/whole-body-apoptosis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controversies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthehuman.org/?p=3011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When, if ever, should we intentionally shorten our lives? Programming our own deaths is not a subject many people seem to have thought much about. But think about it we must. For biotechnologies continue to advance, our psychological identities continue to depend on our being embodied, and more and more of us spend our last days in debilitated confused states. Were we to find a means of safely and effectively cutting short the suffering and frustration of older and older age, wouldn’t it be unethical not to use it? <p>Continue reading <a href="http://onthehuman.org/2011/12/whole-body-apoptosis/">Whole-Body Apoptosis and the Meanings of Lives</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onthehuman.org/2011/12/whole-body-apoptosis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going Forth and Multiplying: Animal Acclimatization and Invasion</title>
		<link>http://onthehuman.org/2011/11/going-forth-and-multiplying/</link>
		<comments>http://onthehuman.org/2011/11/going-forth-and-multiplying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 02:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthehuman.org/?p=2927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="wp-caption-text">Professor Harriet Ritvo</p> <p>People were on the move in the nineteenth century. Millions of men and women participated in massive transfers of human population, spurred by war, famine, persecution, the search for a better life, or (most rarely) the spirit of adventure. The largest of these transfers—although by no means the only one—was from <p>Continue reading <a href="http://onthehuman.org/2011/11/going-forth-and-multiplying/">Going Forth and Multiplying: Animal Acclimatization and Invasion</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onthehuman.org/2011/11/going-forth-and-multiplying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Knowledge of our own thoughts is just as interpretive as knowledge of the thoughts of others</title>
		<link>http://onthehuman.org/2011/10/knowledge-of-our-own-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://onthehuman.org/2011/10/knowledge-of-our-own-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-knowledge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthehuman.org/?p=2894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Philosophers have traditionally assumed that knowledge of our own thoughts is special. Descartes famously believed that knowledge of our current thoughts is infallible. He also believed that those thoughts themselves are self-presenting, so that whenever one entertains a thought, one is capable of infallible knowledge of it. Many figures in the history of philosophy have <p>Continue reading <a href="http://onthehuman.org/2011/10/knowledge-of-our-own-thoughts/">Knowledge of our own thoughts is just as interpretive as knowledge of the thoughts of others</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onthehuman.org/2011/10/knowledge-of-our-own-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loaves, Fishes, and the Human Side of Ecosystems</title>
		<link>http://onthehuman.org/2011/10/human-side-of-ecosystems/</link>
		<comments>http://onthehuman.org/2011/10/human-side-of-ecosystems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthehuman.org/?p=2862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p class="wp-caption-text">Professor Les Kaufman</p>Slow news days send hungry journalists back to the old springheads of mystery and metamorphosis: dark matter, how the brain really works, human cyborgs, life on other worlds.  The nature of humanity’s relationship with Nature — the oldest campfire subject on the books, and kissing cousin to the meaning of life — <p>Continue reading <a href="http://onthehuman.org/2011/10/human-side-of-ecosystems/">Loaves, Fishes, and the Human Side of Ecosystems</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onthehuman.org/2011/10/human-side-of-ecosystems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Animal In Mind: People, Cattle and Shared Nature on the African Savannah</title>
		<link>http://onthehuman.org/2011/10/animal-in-mind/</link>
		<comments>http://onthehuman.org/2011/10/animal-in-mind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthehuman.org/?p=2841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p class="wp-caption-text">Professor Vigdis Broch-Due</p>It is a commonplace that East African pastoralists like Turkana of Northern Kenya identify themselves with their animals. However it really goes far beyond that. To grasp not just the emotional intensity of Turkana bonds with their cattle but the ways in which their life projects are intertwined, is to feel the <p>Continue reading <a href="http://onthehuman.org/2011/10/animal-in-mind/">Animal In Mind: People, Cattle and Shared Nature on the African Savannah</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onthehuman.org/2011/10/animal-in-mind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dark Dark Side of the Mind</title>
		<link>http://onthehuman.org/2011/09/the-dark-dark-side-of-the-mind/</link>
		<comments>http://onthehuman.org/2011/09/the-dark-dark-side-of-the-mind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sociology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthehuman.org/?p=2763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whatever social changes have occurred that involve race, our children are not different from us in their implicit race attitude. What does this mean, given the change in gender stereotypes by age? Does it mean that in spite of all the changes since civil rights legislation, social change and media change, that a 10 year old and a 70 year old have the same race attitude? Does it mean that racially our lives are still so segregated that that to nudge implicit attitudes we haven’t created the appropriate conditions of contact? <p>Continue reading <a href="http://onthehuman.org/2011/09/the-dark-dark-side-of-the-mind/">The Dark Dark Side of the Mind</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onthehuman.org/2011/09/the-dark-dark-side-of-the-mind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Health Impact Fund: a better way to reward new medicines</title>
		<link>http://onthehuman.org/2011/09/the-health-impact-fund/</link>
		<comments>http://onthehuman.org/2011/09/the-health-impact-fund/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthehuman.org/?p=2738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="wp-caption-text">Thomas Pogge, Leitner Professor of Philosophy and International Affairs chair, Yale University</p> <p>With some of the goods and services we consume, supplying the first unit costs vastly more than the rest. Building a subway line costs billions. The additional cost of making it carry more passengers is minuscule by comparison: pennies per ride for <p>Continue reading <a href="http://onthehuman.org/2011/09/the-health-impact-fund/">The Health Impact Fund: a better way to reward new medicines</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onthehuman.org/2011/09/the-health-impact-fund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

